GRESB, the environmental, social and governance (ESG) benchmark for real assets, has released the results for the 2019 GRESB Real Estate Assessment. The results are used by more than 100 institutional investors, representing USD 22 trillion in AUM, to monitor investments, engage with managers, and make decisions that lead to a more sustainable real estate industry. Here is a summary of some of the most interesting results:
1,005 property companies, REITs, funds and developers, representing more than USD 4.1 trillion AUM, participated in the 2019 GRESB Assessment. The Assessment now covers more than 100,000 assets, of which more than 66,000 were reported at the asset level.
The comprehensive nature of the benchmark reveals meaningful global and regional insights and allows us to track the performance of the sector against key national and policy goals such as the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UN SDGs), the Paris Climate Agreement, and the net-zero targets laid down by the World Green Building Council (WorldGBC).
Global and regional sustainability scores
Globally, the average GRESB Score increased from 68 in 2018 to 72 in 2019, demonstrating a sector making strong improvements in overall sustainability performance. Listed property companies still outperform the private sector, but this gap is now negligible compared to previous years. Similarly, while average GRESB scores for offices continue to outperform other property types, the other sectors are closing in.
The regional breakdown of GRESB scores show that real estate companies and funds in Oceania continue to lead the world in sustainability performance, a position the region has held for a remarkable 9 years in a row. In 2019, the average GRESB Score for Oceania comes in at 81 (2018: 76), compared to the global average of 72. Notably, more than half of the GRESB 5-star rated portfolios (the highest rating and recognition for being an industry leader) are located in the region.
The average GRESB Score for the Asian real estate sector is now 72 (2018: 66). This is close to the global average and second only to Oceania. The listed sector largely accounts for this uptick in performance, significantly outperforming the private real estate sector in the region. This pattern differs from other regions, where sustainability performance is increasing faster in the private sector.
Both the European and American real estate sectors have improved average GRESB Scores in 2019. America comes in with a score of 72 (2018: 70), nudging slightly ahead of the European GRESB Score of 71 (2018: 66). Once again, Europe leads the world in transparency with the highest number of entities participating in the benchmark, while the North American GRESB cohort remains the largest in dollar terms globally.
More improvement needed to reach global goals
With increasing sustainability scores around the world, the data tells the story of a sector stepping up decisively to respond to investor demand for greater ESG transparency and performance. But it’s also clear that more improvements are needed to meet key global goals and achieve the transition to a low-carbon, resilient and more sustainable future.
The 2019 results show global like-for-like GHG emissions falling by 2.66%, a lower rate than the 4.91% reduction achieved in the previous year. This slower reduction rate will not be enough to meet the 1.5-degree target set out by the Paris Climate Agreement. After three years of consecutive reductions, global energy consumption increased by 0.20%. And with only three net-zero portfolios in the 2019 benchmark, much more still needs to be done to shift the sector to a sustainable path.
At the same time, the 2019 results show many encouraging developments. For example:
88% of GRESB participants have annual performance targets linked to ESG outcomes (up from 83% in 2018).
69% of entities now have Board-level financial compensation linked to ESG goals, an important indicator of ESG integration at the highest levels of governance.
90% of GRESB participants monitor employee satisfaction, 81% monitor tenant satisfaction and 79% monitor impact on the community, putting the conditions in place for improvements in social aspects of ESG.
In its second year, there was a 96% increase in entities participating in the voluntary Resilience Module, which is aligned with the recommendations released by the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD). The uptick in participation demonstrates an increasing awareness of the need to respond to investor attention on climate risks and resilience.
Participants are including health and well-being as an explicit component of their ESG strategy